Kubrick used 2001 to illustrate technological, physical and psychological enslavement. ‘I am afraid I can’t do that, Dave’ - HAL 'Alexa, call my lawyer!' Are you legally liable if someone makes a purchase using your virtual assistant? But that’s OK – like the 2001: A Space Odyssey crew, you probably don’t understand or read them anyway. ![]() ![]() Oh, and if you believe you are protected by the terms and conditions, you are likely mistaken. If companies are recording you in your home, slip ups like sending recordings to the wrong person, unintentionally releasing information, or accidentally allowing someone to listen in are inevitable. ![]() No surprise, that’s exactly what Amazon’s been doing. Then push came to shove… and well, eventually the crew ended up getting the shove.Īn unintended consequence of having a virtual assistant at our beck and call is that it is always listening, and it may also be recording. When the crew steps out of the ship to have a moment of privacy, HAL’s cameras could still see them and got the gist of their not-so-private conversation. They didn’t know he could lie, and they were also unaware he could read lips. In 2001: A Space Odyssey, the crew clearly never read the HAL “Quick Start Guide”. There's a reason Siri, Alexa and AI are imagined as female – sexism So, while companies are marketing virtual assistants as your “assistant”, they are in fact your “analyst”. Mining big data for predictive analytics is all the rage in the business world. The commercial benefit of virtual assistants lies in their ability to predict your behaviour through what they capture, and create opportunities for transactions. So much so, that even their creators are not quite sure of their capabilities, or how they will reach their goal. Like HAL, these machines process incredible amounts of data. It might not seem that way because virtual assistants wear the halo of trust earned by the other services they are known for – Google’s search is unparalleled and Amazon’s retail experience leads the global marketplace. Consumers may be more educated about their online privacy these days, yet the consequences of the virtual world intruding into the physical hasn’t properly permeated public consciousness.Īllowing a machine to record you 24/7 in exchange for convenience is a high price to pay. Likewise, although it is clear that the function of modern virtual assistants are driven by profit, it isn’t obvious to the average consumer exactly how their presence is being monetised. Or that HAL’s loyalty is to Mission Control and, beyond that, his programming. It doesn’t occur to them that the people who designed HAL might not have had the crew’s best interests at heart. The crew trust HAL, eschewing privacy for the sake of his aid in controlling the whole ship. But with cognitive capabilities well beyond those of his human companions, HAL is omnipresent – and embedded in the technology keeping the crew alive. In 2001: A Space Odyssey, HAL is introduced to the crew of a spaceship as one of them. This article was originally published on BGR.The film illustrates the technological ecosystem companies are really competing to own – one where we trade in our privacy for small conveniences.ĭo I want an always-on digital assistant listening in all the time? ![]() More from BGR: Report claims Surface Pro 4 has a killer feature iPad users can only dream of 'Universal Search' on the Apple TV will be a lot more helpful than we thought IPhone 6s launch sales in Japan weaker than iPhone 6, report says IPhone 6s' 3D Touch: How to adjust sensitivity and even turn it off Siri is currently available on iPhone, iPad and Apple Watch, and it’s likely it’ll be incorporated in future Apple products, including a future Apple car. While it’ll be a while before Siri can actually develop HAL9000-like powers, the virtual assistant is widely deployed in Apple’s ecosystem. The startup also has technology that would let apps learn more about the user, the kind of technology that would make Siri an even better Google Now and Cortana rival. VocalIQ technology will likely be used to improve Siri’s ability to understand human speech. “Apple buys smaller technology companies from time to time, and we generally do not discuss our purpose or plans,” the company said about the purchase. It’s not known how much Apple paid for the VocalIQ, and the iPhone maker gave the Times the same familiar statement it offers every time it buys other companies. Late last week, The Financial Times reported that Apple purchased a U.K.-based startup called VocalIQ that makes artificial intelligence software for processing natural language. DON’T MISS: Report claims Surface Pro 4 has a killer feature iPad users can only dream of
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |